group evaluation (chloe)

as we worked together in the preliminary task i feel that we are able to see how far we have actually come as a group, i feel that in the preliminary task we generally done everything together, whereas in this task, we split the work between us and worked on little bits individually in order to meet the deadline and achieve everything that we set out to, although we worked individually i feel that the work was set out equally between us all, and we all had the same amount of input throughout.

some tasks proved to be more challenging than others, the voice over was hard as at the time there was alot of people in the room trying to complete their work, so we had to redo that a few times in order to get it to the standard its currently at, we made a few changes along the way due to things not fitting in, the more we experimented with camera angles, settings, and location the more we got to know what works and what doesnt, where-as in the preliminary task all that was required was the opening/ coming through of a door, a 180 pan and the start of a convo. in our opening sequence the only guidline was 2 minutes which meant we all had to come together with our ideas.

some things proved to be harder than others, stuart turned out to be a pro at the mac whereas me and alex couldnt get our heads around it, although we did try our best to learn and take it all in from watching stuart edit, although when i tried i didnt really no what i was doing! and prefered to use the other aspects of technology.

i feel that we all had equal input with the actually making of the task and shared the task of filming depending on who was currently in the scene etc. we also put our idea's together and negotiated in order to come up with our final product.. i feel that as a group we worked well together and set out to do all that we intended to, i also feel that it relates to our research and will be suitable for our target audiance :)